• Breaking News

    Thursday, February 25, 2016

    Syllogism Concept and Important tricks

           sponsored links
    ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR DERIVING  CONCLUSIONS IN SYLLOGISM

    Point No 1 :
    Statements : All girls are singers
                         No singer is dancer
       In the above statements,  term "girls" is called the Subject  , "dancer" is called Predicate , "Singer" is called medium                        
    The medium(singer) connects two statements to give a new conclusion  “No girls is dancer”

    Point No 2 :
     In syllogism we deal with only 4 type of statements  starting with
    All
    No
    Some
    Some are not.

    → Statements starting with 'All' is denoted  with ‘A’ ,  Statements starting with 'No' is denoted with’ E’, Statements starting with 'Some' is denoted with ’I’ ,  Statements starting with 'Some are not' is denoted with ‘O’.  { All → A , No → E , some → I , some are not →O}

    Point No 3 :
     When two statements are given, the valid conclusion is drawn only according to the combinations given in below table
      
    Sentences Type
    Conclusion Type
    1 ) All (A) + All (A)
    →  All (A)
    2)   All (A) + No(E)
    → No(E)

    3)No(E) + All(A)
    → Some are not(O)

    4)No(E) + Some(I)
    → Some are not(O)

    5)Some(I) +  All(A)
    → Some(I)

    6)Some(I) + No(E)
    →Some are not(O)

    i.e
    A+ A = A Type , A+E = E Type
    E+A = O Type , E+I =O Type
    I + A = I Type, I + E = O Type conclusions .

    Example 1 : 
    Statements : All Tables are Chairs
                         All Chairs are Buildings

    Explanation :  Above given two statements are in A + A type combination . Hence conclusion should be in A+ A = A type . 


    Conclusion: All tables are buildings 

    Example 2 : 
    Statements:   All tables are chairs
                          No chair is building
    Explanation : Above given two statements are in  A + E type combination. Hence conclusion should be in A+E =  E type.

    Conclusion:  No table is building

    Example 3: 
    Statements:  Some tables are chairs
                         All chairs are buildings

    Explanation: Above given two statements are in I + A type combination. Hence conclusion should be in I+ A= I type.

    Conclusion: Some tables are buildings

    Example 4: 
    Statements : Some tables are chairs 
                         No chair is building

    Explanation : Above given two statements are in I +  E type combination. Hence conclusion should be in I + E = O type.

    Conclusion: Some tables are not buildings 

    Point No 4: 

    While deriving  conclusion by using above table , it is very important to keep in mind the format of conclusion.

    Case 1  
    → In all 4 combinations (  A+ A = A Type , A+E = E Type , I + A = I Type, I + E = O Type ) types , the Subject of conclusion should be Subject of first statement and Predicate of Conclusion should be Predicate of second statement .

    Example:
     Statements :  All  tabless1 are chairs
                           No chair is building P2 

    Explanation :  Above given two statements are in  A + E combination. Hence conclusion should be in A+ E = E type.

    Conclusion:  No tables1is buildingp1

    Case 2 :  
    In E + a = O type and E + I= O type conclusions , Subject of  conclusion is predicate of second statement and predicate of conclusion is subject of first statement.

    Example : 
    Statements:   No tabless1 is chair 
                          Some chairs are  building P2 
     Explanation : Above given two statements are in E + I combination . Hence conclusion should be in E+ I = O type .

    Conclusion : Some buildings P2  are not  tabless1

    Point No 5: 

      If two conclusions have same Subject and same predicate  And
    They are I+O type or A+O type or I+E type of pairs , Then you should mark the answer as "Either I or II follows". The above pairs of conclusions are called Complementary pairs and because of that at least one of the conclusion is always true. 

    Point No 6:
     Example:
     Statements:   Some tables are chairs
                           All chairs are buildings 

    Explanation:  As above given two statements are in I + A combination, conclusion should be in I+A= I type .

    Conclusion:  Some tables are buildings 

    The Important point here is   that above conclusion can be converted and re written as "Some buildings are tables." . 
                                                 Both conclusions are correct for the above given statements as second conclusion is conversion of first conclusion. In Bank PO level exams , to trick you and make it hard , examiners will give converted conclusions mostly. 

    Click here to Read more Reasoning topics







    Please like it to support our work

    Comments

    Not using Html Comment Box  yet?

    No one has commented yet. Be the first!

    rss

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Fashion

    Beauty

    Travel